Ryzen 7 8700F vs i7-620UE
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 285 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 53.28 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 28.55 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $248 | $270 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.07 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.07 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 8 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1288 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 1 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-620UE has 261.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-620UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UE and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
