i5-10400F vs i7-620UE
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 917 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 12 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 22.93 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.94 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $248 | $155 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.07 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 8 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1288 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 30 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-620UE has 261.1% lower power consumption.
i5-10400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i7-620UE is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UE and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
