Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Core i7-610E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-610E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.34
+74%

i7-610E outperforms Core 2 Duo T9900 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22312620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332$530

Detailed specifications

Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.53 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1066 MHz
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB6 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.2125V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8.79 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-610E 1.34
+74%
Core 2 Duo T9900 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-610E 2071
+74.5%
Core 2 Duo T9900 1187

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.34 0.77
Recency 7 January 2010 2 June 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

i7-610E has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i7-610E is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-610E and Core 2 Duo T9900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-610E
Core i7-610E
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
Core 2 Duo T9900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-610E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 134 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-610E or Core 2 Duo T9900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.