Athlon 64 FX-55 vs i7-5960X

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking931not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.75no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency5.42no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Die size356 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011939
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-5960X 12744
+3054%
Athlon 64 FX-55 404

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2014 10 October 2004
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 104 Watt

i7-5960X has an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-55, on the other hand, has 34.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5960X and Athlon 64 FX-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5960X
Core i7-5960X
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 223 votes

Rate Core i7-5960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5960X or Athlon 64 FX-55, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.