Atom N550 vs Core i7-5930K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-5930K and Atom N550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking971not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.55no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameHaswell-E (2014)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 September 2014 (9 years ago)23 August 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$613$86
Current price$380 (0.6x MSRP)$198 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-5930K and Atom N550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus supportno data666 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-5930K and Atom N550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-5930K and Atom N550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response+no data
Demand Based Switching--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-5930K and Atom N550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-5930K and Atom N550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-5930K and Atom N550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB2 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-5930K and Atom N550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-5930K 10322
+3547%
Atom N550 283

Core i7-5930K outperforms Atom N550 by 3547% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-5930K 1167
+1723%
Atom N550 64

Core i7-5930K outperforms Atom N550 by 1723% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-5930K 5462
+3774%
Atom N550 141

Core i7-5930K outperforms Atom N550 by 3774% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2014 23 August 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 4
Cost $613 $86
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 8 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-5930K and Atom N550. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i7-5930K is a desktop processor while Atom N550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-5930K and Atom N550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-5930K
Core i7-5930K
Intel Atom N550
Atom N550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 157 votes

Rate Core i7-5930K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 40 votes

Rate Atom N550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-5930K or Atom N550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.