Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-4860HQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4860HQ
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
4.04
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.64
+213%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by a whopping 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1347562
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 February 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434no data
Current priceno data$168

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size264 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1364FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro Graphics 5200no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version35.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4860HQ 4.04
i5-12400F 12.64
+213%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by 213% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4860HQ 6242
i5-12400F 19553
+213%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by 213% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4860HQ 820
i5-12400F 2198
+168%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by 168% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4860HQ 3151
i5-12400F 8947
+184%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by 184% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-4860HQ 7
i5-12400F 20
+196%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-4860HQ by 196% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.04 12.64
Recency 1 February 2014 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4860HQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4860HQ is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860HQ and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4860HQ
Core i7-4860HQ
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Core i7-4860HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11247 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4860HQ or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.