Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-4610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4610M
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
2.06
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.33
+450%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1818642
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.01
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date1 February 2014 (10 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$329
Current price$456 (1.3x MSRP)$162 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.35 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die size118 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,300 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA946AM4
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600-
Max video memory2 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over DisplayPort30Hz at 4096x2160-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4610M 2.06
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.33
+450%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M by 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-4610M 3187
Ryzen 7 2700X 17528
+450%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M by 450% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4610M 1008
Ryzen 7 2700X 1246
+23.6%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M by 24% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-4610M 1880
Ryzen 7 2700X 6099
+224%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-4610M by 224% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.06 11.33
Recency 1 February 2014 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Cost $346 $329
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-4610M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4610M and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4610M
Core i7-4610M
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 63 votes

Rate Core i7-4610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2743 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4610M or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.