Celeron M 560 vs i7-3970X

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1160	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.57	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency	3.39	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	1 November 2012 (12 years ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$593	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	12	1
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	2.13 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	533 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	1 MB
L3 cache	15 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Die size	435 mm2	143 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	70 °C	no data
Number of transistors	2,270 million	291 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA2011	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	64.45 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 November 2012	1 May 2008
Physical cores	6	1
Threads	12	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	30 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3970X and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---