Celeron N6211 vs i7-3960X Extreme Edition
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 296% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1122 | 2168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.33 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7EE | Elkhart Lake |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Elkhart Lake (2022) |
| Release date | 14 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $54 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 33 | no data |
| L2 cache | 1,536 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 15 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 434.72 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2270 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | BGA1493 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211.
| PCIe version | 2.00 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.82 | 1.47 |
| Recency | 14 November 2011 | 17 July 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 6 Watt |
i7-3960X Extreme Edition has a 295.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 2066.7% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
