Pentium 3556U vs Core i7-3770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.18
+515%

i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by a whopping 515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13162623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Pentium
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data
Current price$136 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data10
PCI supportno data-
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.18
+515%
Pentium 3556U 0.68

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 515% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3770K 6465
+511%
Pentium 3556U 1058

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 511% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 709
+129%
Pentium 3556U 310

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 129% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-3770K 2478
+384%
Pentium 3556U 512

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 384% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-3770K 5536
+120%
Pentium 3556U 2515

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 120% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3770K 22190
+357%
Pentium 3556U 4854

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 357% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-3770K 7229
+273%
Pentium 3556U 1939

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 273% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-3770K 6.39
+623%
Pentium 3556U 46.23

Pentium 3556U outperforms Core i7-3770K by 623% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-3770K 8
+438%
Pentium 3556U 1

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 438% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-3770K 1.65
+120%
Pentium 3556U 0.75

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 120% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3770K 3.9
+2500%
Pentium 3556U 0.2

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 2500% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3770K 3698
+211%
Pentium 3556U 1190

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 211% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3770K 43
+377%
Pentium 3556U 9

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 377% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-3770K 172
+250%
Pentium 3556U 49

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 250% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-3770K 12835
+418%
Pentium 3556U 2478

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 418% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-3770K 3322
+126%
Pentium 3556U 1467

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 126% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i7-3770K 12435
+297%
Pentium 3556U 3129

Core i7-3770K outperforms Pentium 3556U by 297% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.18 0.68
Recency 29 April 2012 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 15 Watt

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3556U in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3770K is a desktop processor while Pentium 3556U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Pentium 3556U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
Intel Pentium 3556U
Pentium 3556U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2432 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 139 votes

Rate Pentium 3556U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or Pentium 3556U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.