Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Core i7-3770K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.07
+429%
Core 2 Duo T9800
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77

Core i7-3770K outperforms Core 2 Duo T9800 by a whopping 429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13972637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency5.002.08
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$530

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.92 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/s1066 MHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.07
+429%
Core 2 Duo T9800 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770K 6466
+432%
Core 2 Duo T9800 1216

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3770K 713
+109%
Core 2 Duo T9800 341

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3770K 2501
+301%
Core 2 Duo T9800 623

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-3770K 5536
+52.4%
Core 2 Duo T9800 3633

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-3770K 22190
+224%
Core 2 Duo T9800 6839

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-3770K 7229
+175%
Core 2 Duo T9800 2626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.07 0.77
Recency 29 April 2012 1 January 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 35 Watt

i7-3770K has a 428.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T9800, on the other hand, has 120% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9800 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3770K is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T9800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Core 2 Duo T9800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Core 2 Duo T9800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2649 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 66 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or Core 2 Duo T9800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.