Atom Z3740 vs i7-3770K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3770K
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.07
+944%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

Core i7-3770K outperforms Atom Z3740 by a whopping 944% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13993005
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency5.0018.45
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theft++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz667 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3770K 4.07
+944%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3770K 6466
+941%
Atom Z3740 621

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-3770K 5536
+475%
Atom Z3740 963

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-3770K 22190
+557%
Atom Z3740 3380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-3770K 7229
+293%
Atom Z3740 1838

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-3770K 6.39
+354%
Atom Z3740 29

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i7-3770K 3.9
+434%
Atom Z3740 0.7

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i7-3770K 3698
+136%
Atom Z3740 1569

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i7-3770K 12835
+390%
Atom Z3740 2617

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i7-3770K 3322
+319%
Atom Z3740 792

Geekbench 2

i7-3770K 12435
+380%
Atom Z3740 2592

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.07 0.39
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 29 April 2012 27 September 2013
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 2 Watt

i7-3770K has a 943.6% higher aggregate performance score, 53.2% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 3750% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3770K is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.

Note that Core i7-3770K is a desktop processor while Atom Z3740 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3770K and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3770K
Core i7-3770K
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2656 votes

Rate Core i7-3770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3770K or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.