Pentium 3550M vs i7-3740QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3740QM
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.68
+328%

i7-3740QM outperforms Pentium 3550M by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14642515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Pentium
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date30 September 2012 (11 years ago)1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$134

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2130 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors1400 Million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1224,FCPGA988FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGAno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3740QM 3.68
+328%
Pentium 3550M 0.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3740QM 5697
+328%
Pentium 3550M 1330

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.68 0.86
Recency 30 September 2012 1 October 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 37 Watt

i7-3740QM has a 327.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium 3550M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 21.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-3740QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3550M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3740QM and Pentium 3550M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3740QM
Core i7-3740QM
Intel Pentium 3550M
Pentium 3550M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 1974 votes

Rate Core i7-3740QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 38 votes

Rate Pentium 3550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3740QM or Pentium 3550M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.