A9-9420 vs Core i7-3689Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3689Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
1.27
+30.9%

Core i7-3689Y outperforms A9-9420 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21992397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current priceno data$440

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size118 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FT4
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000Radeon R5
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3689Y 1.27
+30.9%
A9-9420 0.97

Core i7-3689Y outperforms A9-9420 by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-3689Y 1967
+31.4%
A9-9420 1497

Core i7-3689Y outperforms A9-9420 by 31% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 0.97
Recency 8 January 2013 31 May 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

The Core i7-3689Y is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3689Y and A9-9420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3689Y
Core i7-3689Y
AMD A9-9420
A9-9420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-3689Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 500 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3689Y or A9-9420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.