Celeron 827E vs i7-3635QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1592not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date30 September 2012 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache6 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1400 Million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1224no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3635QM 4816
+1198%
Celeron 827E 371

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

i7-3635QM has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 827E, on the other hand, has 164.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3635QM and Celeron 827E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3635QM
Core i7-3635QM
Intel Celeron 827E
Celeron 827E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate Core i7-3635QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3635QM or Celeron 827E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.