Ryzen 9 6900HX vs i7-3610QE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-3610QE
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.26
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
16.09
+394%

Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms i7-3610QE by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1581425
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date29 April 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size160 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketG2 (988B)FP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000AMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-3610QE 3.26
Ryzen 9 6900HX 16.09
+394%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-3610QE 5026
Ryzen 9 6900HX 24809
+394%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i7-3610QE 524
Ryzen 9 6900HX 2010
+284%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i7-3610QE 1825
Ryzen 9 6900HX 9738
+434%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.26 16.09
Recency 29 April 2012 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 9 6900HX has a 393.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 6900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3610QE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-3610QE and Ryzen 9 6900HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-3610QE
Core i7-3610QE
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Core i7-3610QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 413 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 6900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-3610QE or Ryzen 9 6900HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.