EPYC 73F3 vs Core i7-2820QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2820QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.84
EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.81
+950%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms i7-2820QM by a whopping 950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1603132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan (2021)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568$3,521
Current price$567 (1x MSRP)$2271 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size216 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1224,FCPGA988,PPGA988SP3
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2820QM 2.84
EPYC 73F3 29.81
+950%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Core i7-2820QM by 950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2820QM 4385
EPYC 73F3 46103
+951%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Core i7-2820QM by 951% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 29.81
Recency 3 January 2011 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Cost $568 $3521
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2820QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2820QM is a notebook processor while EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2820QM and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2820QM
Core i7-2820QM
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 150 votes

Rate Core i7-2820QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2820QM or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.