i9-13900K vs i7-2710QE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2710QE
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.59
Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.86
+1362%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i7-2710QE by a whopping 1362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking173689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i9
Power efficiency5.3513.90
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2130
L1 cache256 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size216 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1160 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16.6 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.598 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2710QE 2.59
i9-13900K 37.86
+1362%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2710QE 4044
i9-13900K 59021
+1359%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.59 37.86
Integrated graphics card 0.66 6.15
Recency 3 January 2011 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

i7-2710QE has 177.8% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has a 1361.8% higher aggregate performance score, 831.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, and 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2710QE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2710QE is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2710QE and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2710QE
Core i7-2710QE
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2710QE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1921 vote

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2710QE or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.