Processor N200 vs i7-2675QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2675QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.48
+58%

i7-2675QM outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17382095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB6 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1160 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1224Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 1.57
Integrated graphics card 0.66 3.16
Recency 4 September 2011 3 January 2023
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 6 Watt

i7-2675QM has a 58% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has 378.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2675QM is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2675QM and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2675QM
Core i7-2675QM
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Core i7-2675QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 128 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2675QM or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.