i3-N300 vs i7-2667M

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiencyno data73.28
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket G2FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.66 5.58
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

i3-N300 has 745.5% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2667M and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2667M
Core i7-2667M
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Core i7-2667M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 76 votes

Rate Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2667M or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.