Core i5-11400T vs Core i7-2657M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2657M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.02
Core i5-11400T
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
8.81
+764%

i5-11400T outperforms i7-2657M by a whopping 764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2360812
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$182
Current price$618 (1.9x MSRP)$113 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size8.01 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000Intel UHD Graphics 730
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.2 GHz
Execution Unitsno data24
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2657M 1.02
i5-11400T 8.81
+764%

Core i5-11400T outperforms Core i7-2657M by 764% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2657M 3491
i5-11400T 6122
+75.4%

Core i5-11400T outperforms Core i7-2657M by 75% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2657M 6229
i5-11400T 20362
+227%

Core i5-11400T outperforms Core i7-2657M by 227% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2657M 2546
i5-11400T 7263
+185%

Core i5-11400T outperforms Core i7-2657M by 185% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2657M 2
i5-11400T 7
+282%

Core i5-11400T outperforms Core i7-2657M by 282% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.02 8.81
Recency 3 January 2011 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Cost $317 $182
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i5-11400T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2657M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2657M is a notebook processor while Core i5-11400T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2657M and Core i5-11400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2657M
Core i7-2657M
Intel Core i5-11400T
Core i5-11400T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 49 votes

Rate Core i5-11400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2657M or Core i5-11400T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.