Xeon E-2488 vs Core i7-2637M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2637M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
1.18
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
19.26
+1532%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms i7-2637M by a whopping 1532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2297285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raptor Lake-S
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size149 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA10231700
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2637M 1.18
Xeon E-2488 19.26
+1532%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i7-2637M by 1532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

i7-2637M 1831
Xeon E-2488 29795
+1527%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Core i7-2637M by 1527% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 19.26
Recency 3 January 2011 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 95 Watt

i7-2637M has 458.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 1532.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2637M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2637M is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2637M and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2637M
Core i7-2637M
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate Core i7-2637M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2637M or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.