Ryzen 9 7900X vs Core i7-2635QM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2635QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.18
Ryzen 9 7900X
2022
12 cores / 24 threads, 170 Watt
33.52
+1438%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms i7-2635QM by a whopping 1438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1765103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.50
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raphael (Zen4)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data
Current price$634 (1.7x MSRP)$511

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size216 mm22x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1224AM5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX5 nm (CCD), 6 nm (I/O) nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2635QM 2.18
Ryzen 9 7900X 33.52
+1438%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 1438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2635QM 3371
Ryzen 9 7900X 51839
+1438%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 1438% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2635QM 449
Ryzen 9 7900X 2926
+552%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 552% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2635QM 1416
Ryzen 9 7900X 17859
+1161%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 1161% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2635QM 3699
Ryzen 9 7900X 8623
+133%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 133% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2635QM 13581
Ryzen 9 7900X 68580
+405%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 405% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2635QM 4906
Ryzen 9 7900X 21284
+334%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 334% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2635QM 15
Ryzen 9 7900X 1.8
+733%

Core i7-2635QM outperforms Ryzen 9 7900X by 733% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2635QM 5
Ryzen 9 7900X 55
+1068%

Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i7-2635QM by 1068% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 33.52
Integrated graphics card 0.66 4.34
Recency 3 January 2011 27 September 2022
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 170 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2635QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2635QM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 7900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2635QM and Ryzen 9 7900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2635QM
Core i7-2635QM
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
Ryzen 9 7900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2635QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 889 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2635QM or Ryzen 9 7900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.