Ryzen 3 3300X vs Core i7-2620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2620M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.57
Ryzen 3 3300X
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.68
+453%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms i7-2620M by a whopping 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2023827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.88
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)24 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346$120
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$145 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors624 Million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2620M 1.57
Ryzen 3 3300X 8.68
+453%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-2620M 2425
Ryzen 3 3300X 13425
+454%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 454% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2620M 503
Ryzen 3 3300X 1668
+232%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 232% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-2620M 1011
Ryzen 3 3300X 5783
+472%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 472% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-2620M 4333
Ryzen 3 3300X 5856
+35.1%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 35% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-2620M 9433
Ryzen 3 3300X 25416
+169%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 169% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-2620M 16.18
Ryzen 3 3300X 6.04
+168%

Core i7-2620M outperforms Ryzen 3 3300X by 168% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-2620M 3
Ryzen 3 3300X 12
+286%

Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-2620M by 286% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 8.68
Recency 20 February 2011 24 April 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Cost $346 $120
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3300X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2620M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2620M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 3300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2620M and Ryzen 3 3300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2620M
Core i7-2620M
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
Ryzen 3 3300X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 169 votes

Rate Core i7-2620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1025 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2620M or Ryzen 3 3300X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.