E2-9000 vs i7-2620M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2620M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.53
+151%
E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.61

Core i7-2620M outperforms E2-9000 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21272784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency4.145.77
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$346no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size149 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistors624 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2620M and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXVirtualization,
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2620M and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2620M and E2-9000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2620M and E2-9000.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2620M 1.53
+151%
E2-9000 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2620M 2423
+151%
E2-9000 967

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2620M 4333
+142%
E2-9000 1787

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2620M 9433
+226%
E2-9000 2897

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2620M 3827
+146%
E2-9000 1556

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i7-2620M 16.18
+124%
E2-9000 36.23

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-2620M 3
+203%
E2-9000 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 0.61
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.03
Recency 20 February 2011 1 June 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

i7-2620M has a 150.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

E2-9000, on the other hand, has 56.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2620M is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2620M and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2620M
Core i7-2620M
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 177 votes

Rate Core i7-2620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 311 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2620M or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.