i7-1068G7 vs i7-2610UE
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-1068G7 outperforms Core i7-2610UE by a whopping 454% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2825 | 1448 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.03 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | Intel Core i7 |
| Power efficiency | 2.16 | 7.27 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| Release date | no data | 1 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $317 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | OPI |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 4 × 4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 15 | 23 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 624 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Core i7-1068G7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 59.732 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.87 | 4.82 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.61 | 4.98 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 28 Watt |
i7-2610UE has 64.7% lower power consumption.
i7-1068G7, on the other hand, has a 454% higher aggregate performance score, 716.4% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core i7-1068G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-2610UE in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
