A10-8700P vs Core i7-14700HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-14700HX
2024
20 cores / 28 threads, 55 Watt
24.47
+1588%

i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by a whopping 1588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1862099
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRaptor Lake-HXAMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshCarrizo (2015−2018)
Release date9 January 2024 (less than a year ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Current priceno data$466

Detailed specifications

Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz3.2 GHz
L2 cache24 MB2048 KB
L3 cache30 MBno data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm28 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1964FP4
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt12 - 35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2HSA 1.0
AES-NI+1
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data1
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 14th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Quick Sync Video+no data
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency1.6 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.6no data
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-14700HX 24.47
+1588%
A10-8700P 1.45

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-14700HX 37845
+1592%
A10-8700P 2237

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1592% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-14700HX 2495
+403%
A10-8700P 496

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 403% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i7-14700HX 13453
+1124%
A10-8700P 1099

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1124% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i7-14700HX 11767
+404%
A10-8700P 2334

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 404% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-14700HX 68172
+966%
A10-8700P 6394

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 966% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i7-14700HX 18104
+508%
A10-8700P 2978

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 508% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i7-14700HX 2.69
+539%
A10-8700P 17.19

A10-8700P outperforms Core i7-14700HX by 539% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i7-14700HX 10
+346%
A10-8700P 2

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 346% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-14700HX 3780
+1848%
A10-8700P 194

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1848% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i7-14700HX 269
+290%
A10-8700P 69

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 290% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i7-14700HX 3.63
+322%
A10-8700P 0.86

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 322% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-14700HX 19.3
+1187%
A10-8700P 1.5

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1187% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-14700HX 10202
+668%
A10-8700P 1328

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 668% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-14700HX 177
+1069%
A10-8700P 15

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 1069% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i7-14700HX 365
+396%
A10-8700P 74

Core i7-14700HX outperforms A10-8700P by 396% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.47 1.45
Recency 9 January 2024 3 June 2015
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 28 4
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 12 Watt

The Core i7-14700HX is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-8700P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-14700HX and A10-8700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-14700HX
Core i7-14700HX
AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 72 votes

Rate Core i7-14700HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 114 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-14700HX or A10-8700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.