FirePro A300 vs Core i7-12700KF
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 226 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 44.53 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 27 October 2021 (2 years ago) | 7 August 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $384 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 4.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 192K |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 215.25 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.805 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | FirePro |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 October 2021 | 7 August 2012 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
i7-12700KF has an age advantage of 9 years, and 200% more physical cores and 400% more threads.
FirePro A300, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-12700KF and FirePro A300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
