Ryzen 3 5425C vs i7-12700E
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 310 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | January 2022 (2 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 25 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 215 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-12700E has 200% more physical cores and 150% more threads.
Ryzen 3 5425C, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-12700E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 5425C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-12700E and Ryzen 3 5425C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
