EPYC 8024P vs Core i5
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8024P outperforms Core i5 by a whopping 512% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5 and EPYC 8024P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1772 | 532 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Siena |
| Release date | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | no data |
| Current price | $190 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5 and EPYC 8024P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,875 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 90 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5 and EPYC 8024P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 8024P outperforms Core i5 by 512% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 8024P outperforms Core i5 by 691% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.17 | 13.29 |
The EPYC 8024P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5 in performance tests.
Note that Core i5 is a desktop processor while EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5 and EPYC 8024P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
