Ultra 7 268V vs i5-L16G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
2.13
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
15.17
+612%

Core Ultra 7 268V outperforms Core i5-L16G7 by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1868463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice Lakeno data
Power efficiency28.6584.01
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads58
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache80 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-CSP1016Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4X-4267DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsArc 140V
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units64no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX12no data
OpenGLOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-L16G7 2.13
Ultra 7 268V 15.17
+612%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-L16G7 1634
Ultra 7 268V 9766
+498%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 15.17
Physical cores 5 8
Threads 5 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 17 Watt

i5-L16G7 has 142.9% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 268V, on the other hand, has a 612.2% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 268V is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-L16G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and Core Ultra 7 268V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
Core Ultra 7 268V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 268V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-L16G7 or Core Ultra 7 268V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.