Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i5-9400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-9400
2018
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.06
Xeon w9-3475X
2023
36 cores / 72 threads, 300 Watt
42.16
+596%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i5-9400 by a whopping 596% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking102249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.9518.10
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Sapphire Rapids
Release date19 October 2018 (5 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182no data
Current price$143 (0.8x MSRP)$3918

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3475X has 21% better value for money than i5-9400.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)36
Threads672
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)82.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size149 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-9400 6.06
Xeon w9-3475X 42.16
+596%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i5-9400 by 596% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-9400 9371
Xeon w9-3475X 65211
+596%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i5-9400 by 596% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400 1382
Xeon w9-3475X 1980
+43.3%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i5-9400 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-9400 4793
Xeon w9-3475X 17462
+264%

Xeon w9-3475X outperforms Core i5-9400 by 264% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.06 42.16
Recency 19 October 2018 1 January 2023
Physical cores 6 36
Threads 6 72
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

The Xeon w9-3475X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-9400 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-9400 is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3475X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-9400 and Xeon w9-3475X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-9400
Core i5-9400
Intel Xeon w9-3475X
Xeon w9-3475X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 938 votes

Rate Core i5-9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3475X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-9400 or Xeon w9-3475X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.