Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs i5-8650K
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 992 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 9 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 1151 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 3.04 |
| Recency | 1 September 2018 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-8650K has 1.6% faster integrated GPU, and 50% more physical cores.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more threads, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8650K and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
