Celeron N2806 vs i5-8400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1110not rated
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency8.47no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date24 September 2017 (7 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$182$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache384 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache9 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz756 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-8400 9238
+1789%
Celeron N2806 489

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-8400 9474
+693%
Celeron N2806 1195

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-8400 11
+1617%
Celeron N2806 1

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-8400 941
+1522%
Celeron N2806 58

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-8400 170
+552%
Celeron N2806 26

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2017 1 December 2013
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

i5-8400 has an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N2806, on the other hand, has 1525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i5-8400 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2806 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-8400 and Celeron N2806, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-8400
Core i5-8400
Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2653 votes

Rate Core i5-8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-8400 or Celeron N2806, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.