Core Ultra 7 155U vs Core i5-750s
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 670 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Meteor Lake-U |
| Architecture codename | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Meteor Lake-P |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | 110 °C |
| Number of transistors | 774 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1156 | BGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 82 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2010 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 82 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ultra 7 155U has an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 250% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 446.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i5-750s is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 155U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-750s and Core Ultra 7 155U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
