Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U vs Core i5-750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-750
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.64
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.74
+128%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms i5-750 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19901402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date23 September 2009 (14 years ago)26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data
Current price$246 (1.6x MSRP)$536

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size296 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-750 1.64
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.74
+128%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms Core i5-750 by 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-750 2537
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5781
+128%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms Core i5-750 by 128% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 3.74
Recency 23 September 2009 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-750 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-750 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-750 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-750
Core i5-750
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 938 votes

Rate Core i5-750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 118 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-750 or Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.