i9-14900KF vs i5-7442EQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7442EQ
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
3.16
Core i9-14900KF
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
38.84
+1129%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i5-7442EQ by a whopping 1129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking162383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5863.63
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Power efficiency11.5328.33
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900KF has 10871% better value for money than i5-7442EQ.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7442EQ 3.16
i9-14900KF 38.84
+1129%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7442EQ 4834
i9-14900KF 59438
+1130%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.16 38.84
Recency 3 January 2017 17 October 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

i5-7442EQ has 400% lower power consumption.

i9-14900KF, on the other hand, has a 1129.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-14900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-7442EQ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-7442EQ is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7442EQ and Core i9-14900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7442EQ
Core i5-7442EQ
Intel Core i9-14900KF
Core i9-14900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-7442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 317 votes

Rate Core i9-14900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7442EQ or Core i9-14900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.