A6-5350M vs i5-7442EQ

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-7442EQ
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
3.04
+295%
A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77

Core i5-7442EQ outperforms A6-5350M by a whopping 295% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16392650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.51no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD A-Series
Power efficiency11.512.08
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
L3 cache6 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon HD 8450G
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M.

PCIe version3.0Not Listed
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-7442EQ 3.04
+295%
A6-5350M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-7442EQ 4834
+296%
A6-5350M 1221

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 0.77
Integrated graphics card 3.11 0.88
Recency 3 January 2017 1 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

i5-7442EQ has a 294.8% higher aggregate performance score, 253.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-7442EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-7442EQ and A6-5350M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-7442EQ
Core i5-7442EQ
AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i5-7442EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-7442EQ or A6-5350M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.