i3-7320T vs i5-6500TE
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1631 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.50 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i5 | Intel Core i3 |
Power efficiency | 8.13 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
Release date | 19 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 17 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $192 | $147 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 23 | 36 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 66 °C | 65 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 1151 | 1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 2.59 | 3.10 |
Recency | 19 October 2015 | 17 July 2017 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
i5-6500TE has 100% more physical cores.
i3-7320T, on the other hand, has 19.7% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6500TE and Core i3-7320T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.