Celeron J1850 vs Core i5-650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-650
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.45
+138%

i5-650 outperforms Celeron J1850 by a whopping 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20992692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.93no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35$82
Current price$30 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1156FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt10 Watt

Security technologies

Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDIntel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-650 1.45
+138%
Celeron J1850 0.61

Core i5-650 outperforms Celeron J1850 by 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-650 2244
+138%
Celeron J1850 942

Core i5-650 outperforms Celeron J1850 by 138% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 0.61
Recency 7 January 2010 1 September 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Cost $35 $82
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 10 Watt

i5-650 has a 137.7% higher aggregate performance score, and its recommended price lower by $47.

Celeron J1850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 630% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1850 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-650 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-650 and Celeron J1850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-650
Core i5-650
Intel Celeron J1850
Celeron J1850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 964 votes

Rate Core i5-650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Celeron J1850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-650 or Celeron J1850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.