Pro A10-8700B vs i5-6402P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6402P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
3.38
+145%
Pro A10-8700B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.38

Core i5-6402P outperforms Pro A10-8700B by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15692238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency4.923.73
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date27 December 2015 (8 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$187no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier28no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
L3 cache6 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12 - 35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2HSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3/DDR3L-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.5no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6402P 3.38
+145%
Pro A10-8700B 1.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6402P 5369
+145%
Pro A10-8700B 2189

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-6402P 1132
+146%
Pro A10-8700B 461

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-6402P 3058
+208%
Pro A10-8700B 992

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.38 1.38
Recency 27 December 2015 3 June 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

i5-6402P has a 144.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A10-8700B, on the other hand, has 441.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-6402P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A10-8700B in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-6402P is a desktop processor while Pro A10-8700B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6402P and Pro A10-8700B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6402P
Core i5-6402P
AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 60 votes

Rate Core i5-6402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 57 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6402P or Pro A10-8700B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.