Processor N95 vs i5-520E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-520E and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1611 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i5 | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Power efficiency | no data | 19.87 |
Architecture codename | Westmere (2010−2011) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $210 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-520E and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 18 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 382 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-520E and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-520E and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-520E and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-520E and Processor N95 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-520E and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1066 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.051 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-520E and Processor N95.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 2.29 |
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Processor N95 has 197.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i5-520E and Processor N95. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-520E and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.