Celeron J4115 vs i5-6287U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6287U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
2.44
+41.9%
Celeron J4115
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.72

Core i5-6287U outperforms Celeron J4115 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17692047
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Gemini Lake
Power efficiency8.0915.98
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Gemini Lake (2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM64 MBno data
Speed Shiftno data-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Graphics 550Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory32 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes126
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6287U 2.44
+41.9%
Celeron J4115 1.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6287U 3799
+41.4%
Celeron J4115 2687

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-6287U 345
+41.4%
Celeron J4115 244

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-6287U 143
+103%
Celeron J4115 71

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.44 1.72
Integrated graphics card 3.70 0.87
Recency 1 September 2015 4 November 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 10 Watt

i5-6287U has a 41.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 325.3% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron J4115, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and 180% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-6287U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-6287U is a notebook processor while Celeron J4115 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6287U and Celeron J4115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6287U
Core i5-6287U
Intel Celeron J4115
Celeron J4115

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate Core i5-6287U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 135 votes

Rate Celeron J4115 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6287U or Celeron J4115, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.