EPYC 9654 vs Core i5-580M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-580M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads
1.27
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
79.71
+6176%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-580M by 6176% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.92
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Genoa
Release date26 September 2010 (13 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$266$11,805
Current price$69 (0.3x MSRP)$3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4800 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81+114 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketBGA1288,PGA988SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-580M 1.27
EPYC 9654 79.71
+6176%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-580M by 6176% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-580M 1951
EPYC 9654 122091
+6158%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-580M by 6158% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-580M 448
EPYC 9654 1829
+308%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-580M by 308% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-580M 798
EPYC 9654 18566
+2227%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Core i5-580M by 2227% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.27 79.71
Recency 26 September 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Cost $266 $11805
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-580M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-580M is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-580M and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-580M
Core i5-580M
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 122 votes

Rate Intel Core i5-580M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-580M or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.