Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Core i5-480M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms i5-480M by a whopping 3409% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2472 | 126 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 9 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $81 | no data |
| Current price | $253 (3.1x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 38 |
| Threads | 4 | 76 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus support | 2400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 57 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 58 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | BGA1288,PGA988 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 270 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors | no data |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 766 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Core i5-480M by 3409% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms Core i5-480M by 3428% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.86 | 30.18 |
| Recency | 9 January 2011 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 38 |
| Threads | 4 | 76 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 270 Watt |
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-480M in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-480M is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-480M and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
