Xeon Platinum 8160M vs i5-4690K
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms i5-4690K by a whopping 834% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1475 | 105 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.49 | 15.35 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 2 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $300 | $7,704 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Platinum 8160M has 3033% better value for money than i5-4690K.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 85 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 1.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 20 | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| VGA | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160@24Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.68 | 34.37 |
| Recency | 2 June 2014 | 25 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 150 Watt |
i5-4690K has 70.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8160M, on the other hand, has a 834% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Platinum 8160M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4690K in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-4690K is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4690K and Xeon Platinum 8160M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
