Core i5-11500B vs Core i5-4590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4590
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 84 Watt
3.47
Core i5-11500B
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.29
+225%

i5-11500B outperforms i5-4590 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1477648
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date1 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$202no data
Current price$83 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache6 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1400 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4590 3.47
i5-11500B 11.29
+225%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-4590 5363
i5-11500B 17468
+226%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 226% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-4590 5479
i5-11500B 9000
+64.3%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 64% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-4590 18998
i5-11500B 41001
+116%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 116% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i5-4590 6
i5-11500B 15
+154%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 154% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-4590 530
i5-11500B 1322
+149%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 149% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i5-4590 146
i5-11500B 223
+52.7%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 53% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i5-4590 1.63
i5-11500B 2.63
+61.3%

Core i5-11500B outperforms Core i5-4590 by 61% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.47 11.29
Recency 1 April 2014 1 April 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 65 Watt

i5-11500B has a 225.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-11500B is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4590 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-4590 is a desktop processor while Core i5-11500B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4590 and Core i5-11500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4590
Core i5-4590
Intel Core i5-11500B
Core i5-11500B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2192 votes

Rate Core i5-4590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 167 votes

Rate Core i5-11500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4590 or Core i5-11500B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.