Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-450M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-450M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.10
+4038%

i9-13900F outperforms i5-450M by a whopping 4038% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2518105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-S
Release date26 September 2010 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32no data
Current price$136 (4.3x MSRP)$508

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency766 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-450M 0.80
i9-13900F 33.10
+4038%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-450M by 4038% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-450M 1235
i9-13900F 51193
+4045%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-450M by 4045% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-450M 342
i9-13900F 2739
+701%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-450M by 701% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-450M 675
i9-13900F 17222
+2451%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-450M by 2451% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 33.10
Recency 26 September 2010 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-450M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i5-450M is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-450M and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-450M
Core i5-450M
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate Core i5-450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 99 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-450M or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.