Celeron 2.70 vs Core i5-4400E
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1800 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Northwood (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 (10 years ago) | September 2003 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $266 | no data |
| Current price | $1280 (4.8x MSRP) | $141 |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 130 mm2 | 146 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 960 Million | 55 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1364 | 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-4400E outperforms Celeron 2.70 by 1945% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 73 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i5-4400E is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.70 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4400E and Celeron 2.70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
