Xeon Gold 5218T vs i5-3570
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5218T outperforms Core i5-3570 by a whopping 334% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1618 | 548 |
| Place by popularity | 48 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.51 | 11.82 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 3.82 | 12.16 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 (12 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $231 | $1,561 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 5218T has 2218% better value for money than i5-3570.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 21 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 22 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 133 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 93 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 67 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| Anti-Theft | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.11 | 13.49 |
| Recency | 1 June 2012 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 77 Watt | 105 Watt |
i5-3570 has 36.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5218T, on the other hand, has a 333.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Xeon Gold 5218T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-3570 in performance tests.
Note that Core i5-3570 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5218T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3570 and Xeon Gold 5218T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
